|
1) The government uses words like "dormant"and "removed" in written material and verbal speech in a very vague manner. The onus is always on a borrower to prove that a debt is not legally recoverable and should be closed, depending on the case. The literature and language that agents with CRA's general collection centers provide (Belleville, Ont, St. John's, and Surrey BC) is totally incongruent with that of the office of attorney general or Justice Canada in respect of limitation issues. In other words, what "CRA call center agents" tell you is usually only a smideon of what you need to know. They do not have the intelligence or experience of the upper community that deals with internal policy and legislations as such. What you need to know is that in a lot of cases acknowledgment is a VERY difficut thing to do. In others, it is as easy as simple though. The front-line system will ALWAYS lead you to think otherwise, and that you "should" do things that could otherwise be dispruptive to a limitation issue. 2. Federal liens are removed, absolutely. However, if there is a debt owed to the NB govenrment then they could hang on to the lien for dear life and keep taking the rebate, if they have a lien in place. I have seen cases where they defy the limnitation issues. They feel that they are not subject to any limitation issues but I have seen no proof of that yet to date.
------------- Solve Student Debt specializes in solutions for students and graduates in student loan default, and those at risk of defaulting.
http://www.solvestudentdebt.com" rel="nofollow - solvestudentdebt.com
|