|
Nealy,
When you wrote:
"Don't worry, they themselves are not empowered to initiate any legal action." ...
you should note that if there is an avenue of execution, then they are absolutely empowered to do so. Although the HRDC has specific guidelines for the litigation of Crown debt, collectors are required to refer files back to HRDC for justice IF the situation warrants it.
Not all threats are scare tactics. It is important to point this out because if someone trusts that they will not be sued simply by reading that statement, and they in turn are sued ....
You wrote:
"For example, it is my understanding that they aren't even allowed to suggest that you borrow money to pay back your student loan. Not from a bank, or a business and not even from friends or family."
Collectors are allowed to suggest that a debtor borrow money, most certainly. The guidelines on this collection practice outlined in the third-party PCA directives (and certain Provincial student loan directives) stipulate that a collector can suggest it - IF a) it is determined that the student loan borrower is clearly able and willing to do so, and; b) IF it is solution to the problem and will not cause any financial hardship.
Suggesting is allowed. Enticing or demanding accompanied by abusive or threatening overtones, unrealistic consequences, or unethical tactics is against policy - and in some cases the law.
YOu wrote:
"They can only refer the case back to the government or their representatives for legal action and that is only after they can prove they have exhausted all other legal avenues to recover the funds and can safely demonstrate that the CSL client,(you) have have no intention of paying anything."
This is for CSL. There is also a checklist that thew collector must follow before the account can be referred. I had posted this checklist in a previous post.
The real problem with this is that collectors can make it appear that a CSL client is not acting in good faith, and is uncooperative when they really are acting in good faith. This is a problem that has plagued many because there is no real supervision in the third-party sector by the government(s). If the collector (backed by the agency) says this is how it is, then the government simply says, "OK".
If a collector wants to lighten the load of accounts in his or her section that are not paying, and the collector feels that it just too much work and a waste of time to make the calls, they simply send them off for justice. This way, they clear some space for other accounts that may be more collectable that will earn them their commission cheque for the month.
|