| Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
oh_sap
Newbie
Joined: 11/April/2005
Location: Burkina Faso
Points: 5
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Statute of Limitations (Ontario) Posted: 20/June/2007 at 10:11am |
|
I posted a similar question some time ago but I don't believe it was ever resolved.
Currently, debts which are owed to the Federal Government are governed by a statute of limitations of six years. In Ontario, this was also the case with debts owed to the Provincial Government. However, in 2002, the Provincial Act was changed to remove the statute of limitations as applied to Student Loans/Debts. This meant that regardless of how long ago your debt was incurred to the province, it would still be active. The important question which I couldn't receive clarification was whether this change to the Act was retroactive -- meaning would it apply to student loans which were defaulted prior to the changes to the Act in 2002 or if it only applied to defaultments after implementation of the Act, 2002 onwards.
Any further information on this topic would be appreciated.
|
 |
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
 |
SolveStudentDebt
Moderator Group
Joined: 05/November/2003
Location: Canada
Points: 5996
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20/June/2007 at 11:28am |
Well, loans that have surpassed limitation time before the coming into force of this ammendment would still be statute barred. There are a lot of interpretations floating out and about.
From what I have been told, limitations are applicable towards loans that have become due on or before 1998 (thereabouts).
Common sense would show that when an act is ammended (in this case - the Ontario limitation of actions), the coming into force of that ammendment would apply to Ontario loans that have not reached the limitation period upon it's coming into force.
Best thing to do is hire a lawyer in Ontario to make an interpretation for you.
Johnny
|
Solve Student Debt specializes in solutions for students and graduates in student loan default, and those at risk of defaulting. solvestudentdebt.com
|
 |
oh_sap
Newbie
Joined: 11/April/2005
Location: Burkina Faso
Points: 5
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20/June/2007 at 12:23pm |
|
Yes, those are the same interpretations which I have come across too.
I my case, I defaulted on a student loan in 1991. Fast forward to 2007 and I have a collection agency coming after me for this same student loan -- 16 years after the fact. But I am in no way agreeing that this collection agency understands the Act or even basic law as we know how they operate.
I will have to have a better read through the Act to finally clear this up. I imagine a great many other people are in this same situation or they have even handed over money to these collection agencies without being obligated to do so.
|
 |
devilchild
Newbie
Joined: 24/October/2006
Points: 2
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22/June/2007 at 7:48am |
Johnny; Can you clarify this please? You posted this on your website...
"There are limitations with respect to Ontario student loans that have defaulted before the coming into force of the new ammendment to the Ontario Limitations Act (2002). Loans that have been opened or defaulted after the coming into force of the new ammendment, there are no limitations that bar the province of Ontario from taking action or proceedings to recover money owed. "
And then I read what you wrote above...I'm confused. If you defaulted prior to the new amendment but your 6 years hadn't expired yet, where do you sit? And did the new amendment begin to apply in 1998 or 2002?
Perhaps I'm reading all of this wrong. But its mighty confusing.
|
 |
SolveStudentDebt
Moderator Group
Joined: 05/November/2003
Location: Canada
Points: 5996
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22/June/2007 at 10:11am |
Confusing it is. I have been told that ther eis a point where a loan carries a limitation, and it is around the 1997-1998 era. This is just what someone had mentioned to me.
Now, it is very hard to believe that once a loan is barred, it could be brought back at a later date. THe last I heard, Jesus was the only one on earth capable of demonstrating a ressurection.
Johnny
|
Solve Student Debt specializes in solutions for students and graduates in student loan default, and those at risk of defaulting. solvestudentdebt.com
|
 |
Zeus
Newbie
Joined: 10/March/2006
Points: 10
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 31/July/2007 at 1:20am |
devilchild wrote:
If you defaulted prior to the new amendment but your 6 years hadn't expired yet, where do you sit? And did the new amendment begin to apply in 1998 or 2002?
Perhaps I'm reading all of this wrong. But its mighty confusing. |
In Ontario, the Limitations Act of 2002 came into effect January 1st,
2004. Under Section 16, the limitation periods on student loans
and grants were removed i.e. no limitation periods. Under Section
24, Transitions, it states that if the old limitation period had not
yet expired, then the new limitation period takes precedence. If
the old limitation period had already expired before the new Act took
effect, then the old period takes precedence.
What this means for something that used to have a six year limitation
period, is that if a claim on a loan or grant was dated before January
1st, 1998 (six years before Jan. 1st, 2004), the loan or grant is
statute barred, or should be, but if the claim is dated after Jan. 1,
1998, there is no limitation period on the claim and the gov't may
pursue it.
Does this clear things up a bit?
Zeus
|
 |
SolveStudentDebt
Moderator Group
Joined: 05/November/2003
Location: Canada
Points: 5996
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 31/July/2007 at 1:31am |
That is how it was expained to me by two groups in Ontario.
|
Solve Student Debt specializes in solutions for students and graduates in student loan default, and those at risk of defaulting. solvestudentdebt.com
|
 |
mitchontario
Newbie
Joined: 10/July/2007
Points: 10
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 06/September/2007 at 7:39am |
I have defaulted loans, end of study date 1997, and NCO tells me on the phone they are still collectable. CRA told me the lien on my refunds for them are still there, they will get it. Shouldn't the old limitation period apply?
|
 |
SolveStudentDebt
Moderator Group
Joined: 05/November/2003
Location: Canada
Points: 5996
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07/September/2007 at 2:23am |
|
depends on when your loan became due.
|
Solve Student Debt specializes in solutions for students and graduates in student loan default, and those at risk of defaulting. solvestudentdebt.com
|
 |
mitchontario
Newbie
Joined: 10/July/2007
Points: 10
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07/September/2007 at 3:56am |
End of study date 05 97. Document sent out end of 97 says Interest commences 1st day of Dec 97, Payment date 01 01 98.
S 24 of the Limitation act refers
"Former limitation period unexpired
(4) If the former limitation period did not expire before the effective date and if no limitation period under this Act would apply were the claim based on an act or omission that took place on or after the effective date, there is no limitation period. 2002, c. 24, Sched. B, s. 24 (4). Ithe question is, did the former one expire? here is a chart that mite help http://www.practicepro.ca/practice/pdf/TransitionRulesChart.pdf
I don't know, I need a freakin lawyer to sort this out.
|
 |
cnma
Newbie
Joined: 02/November/2007
Location: Canada
Points: 8
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21/November/2007 at 7:47am |
Does the 2002 act only apply to Provincial student loans from Ontario?
The government took over 6 years to contact me on my student loan (I went bankrupt in 2001). I live in Alberta ... so would that mean that the statue of limitations still apply?
|
 |
minnietheminx50
Newbie
Joined: 25/April/2008
Location: Canada
Points: 1
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25/April/2008 at 10:41am |
|
Hi, Im new here. I defaulted on a loan in 1996. Made a few payments that year , as a single parent with 4 children made it hard to do. I moved to the stated for 7 years and came back 2 years ago,,,my first income tax this year they swiped all my refund for this loan from 96-7 they never contacted me at all all these years,,,notta none so now i make under 1 thousa a month and the dam collector says to make 2oo dollar payments,,,
my student loan for two year course went from 3000 to 9000 withing that time
im looking at the limitations also,,,,aside from contacting my mpp,,,im so depressed,,,looks like they can just play with you whenever they want to
|
 |
Meengin
Newbie
Joined: 29/April/2008
Location: Canada
Points: 20
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29/April/2008 at 9:40am |
|
I'm wondering about this also... My school went bankrupt in 1998 and then I reapplied to another college... but dropped out in 99, Loan was refunded... I declaired personal bankruptcy in 2000 and discharged in 01. in 2004 I began getting calls for the original loan that I applied for but didn't receive because of the school going bankrupt. 2 years ago they told me that they are going to take my taxes so I refuse to file my taxes for 2 years now hoping that they will take me to court so that I can fight the fact that I don't owe/never received the first loan. Any limitations here?
|
 |
Meengin
Newbie
Joined: 29/April/2008
Location: Canada
Points: 20
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12/May/2008 at 7:57am |
|
Some more info on the stat of limitaions would be helpful please. My studies were to end 05/99 when does the stature start? Repayment was suppost to start September 30, 1999. do I fall under the stat limit? if so I would like to know so I can Call Accounts Recovery Corp on thier bluff and take this to court...
|
 |
phreakgeek
Newbie
Joined: 17/February/2005
Points: 8
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16/June/2008 at 5:15am |
|
Also can someone clairfy if this applies to goverment loand and bank loan.. for students what i mean about these is from my understanding....is the goverment (garenty loan) doesn ot fall under the linitation however the risk portion (bank) does.. is thsi true??
|
 |
Meengin
Newbie
Joined: 29/April/2008
Location: Canada
Points: 20
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17/June/2008 at 12:32am |
|
Stats only applies to the (risk) portion of the loan... from what I can tell through experience.. even though the Guaranteed portin (MTCU) files a claim with bankruptcy or waits 30 years... legislation says that they can take any government monies (GST/HST income tax. etc) to recover monies owed.
|
 |
SolveStudentDebt
Moderator Group
Joined: 05/November/2003
Location: Canada
Points: 5996
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17/June/2008 at 12:48am |
Limitations apply to pretty much all loans. However, certain loan providers are not bound by the limitations, such as the province of ontario. All risk loans are subject to limitations. If a debt is barred, no action or proccedings can be taken to recover the money owed.
Johnny
|
Solve Student Debt specializes in solutions for students and graduates in student loan default, and those at risk of defaulting. solvestudentdebt.com
|
 |
phreakgeek
Newbie
Joined: 17/February/2005
Points: 8
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17/June/2008 at 1:00am |
how does one find out if it has been barred?
I paid the goverment loan off several years ago. Is the risk portion that
is over 8 years old within the limitation.? when does the time stamp start..
I paid off the goverment loan in 2005, have not herd from the bank on thier part until now, since 2000 - 2001.
does the time start back in 2001 or 2005.
also just to let you know.. i thought the loan i paid off in 2005 was the whole loan.
the collection people say it was not.
|
 |
Meengin
Newbie
Joined: 29/April/2008
Location: Canada
Points: 20
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17/June/2008 at 5:55am |
|
then how can ARC collections put a lien on my income tax and GST on behalf of the MTCU 10 years after?
|
 |
SolveStudentDebt
Moderator Group
Joined: 05/November/2003
Location: Canada
Points: 5996
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17/June/2008 at 10:19am |
I just told you, Meengin. The Ontario government is not bound by any limitations with respect to Ontario student loans. MTCU is the Ministry of Training Colleges & Universities, in other words - the Province of Ontario. They can take your income tax and/or GST rebates through the federal set-off program until the debnt is paid. Not being bound by any limitations means thay can do whatever they want (as longas it is within the limitation of the law) to recover money owed to the Province.
Phreak - if you want to know if your debt is statute barred, you are better off seeking professional help. This is not something that can be determined without a lot of digging and investigating. Call me if you want the help - or see if you can find someone who will do it for free. For God's sake, please make sure that whoever it is knows what the heck they are doing. There are a lot of landmines that are laying under your feet while trudging through this particular area.
Johnny
|
Solve Student Debt specializes in solutions for students and graduates in student loan default, and those at risk of defaulting. solvestudentdebt.com
|
 |