This website is a testimony to the problems Canadian Student Loan borrowers experienced from approximately 1996 to 2008 and until their loans were paid off.

The privatization of the Student Loans system by the Chretien and Martin Liberal governments broke the system and defaulted thousands of borrowers who were trying to pay their loans. There were even stories of suicide due to the harassment of borrowers.

Read the report that I prepared back in 2007 here. Canada Student Loans-The Need for Change Fortunately the new Conservative government at the time revamped the program and fixed the system for new borrowers, but borrowers under the previous program were left with ruined credit and continued harassment from debt collectors.

I call on the Canadian Government to apologize to the borrowers affected by this fiasco and make amends.

Unfortunately the Liberal government is again clobbering the Education system with their changes to International Student Visas. Yes, there's a problem, but instead of a well thought out plan, they have pulled the emergency brake on the train causing a derailment. This has introduced unprecedented instability for both private and public education institutions who serve both international and local students.

Universities have been forced to cancel programs and layoff hundreds if not thousands of full-time and contract instructors.

Again, the Liberal government has messed up the education environment.


  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Bankruptcy and student Debt
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login


Forum LockedBankruptcy and student Debt

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Tangotori View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 17/June/2004
Location: Canada
Points: 25
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tangotori Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06/July/2004 at 7:41am

I'm now more discourged then ever.

Like in Peewee's example, I AM 40 and I'm looking at a lifetime of debt. The principle of my debt is so enormous that interest charged is also large - and like I said in my previous post, my monthly payment doesn't come close to touching the principle. Unlike Peewee's example, my annual salary is NOT 50K - and I can't see it being close to 50K for another 5 years or so. I can see the future... I will never be able to pay off this debt.

Johnny - I truely appreciate your frank and honest answers. I'm glad to have the information. It's great to have a resource like you on this forum.

But where's the hope? Up until now I've been placing hope in the Charter Challenge; should I still? If the Ontario Supreme Count finds that the 10 year rule is discriminatory, so what?! What difference will it make?! From what I'm reading and learning, my hope has been misplaced. In fact, I'm finding that there is little to be hopeful for. Sad but true. I will be dealing with my creditors for the rest of my life (won't that be fun... a lifetime of financial reports and hassling phone calls). I'll never be able to afford to send my children to university (can't even afford to get my growing son new shoes today). I won't be able to save for my retirement (closer than I'd like to think). I'll never be able to open a bank account, build credit, own a car or a purchase a home - all things that the average Canadian can take for granted.

I'm usually a pretty up-beat person... but I'm feeling very glum today.

Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
blah View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 18/June/2003
Location: Korea, South
Points: 101
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote blah Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06/July/2004 at 7:41am
OK Johnny, something doesn’t jive here. I personally know a guy who insists he has included a CSL in a bankruptcy and was cleared of the debt. Now this happened back when you could do it after only two years of graduation. But it happened nevertheless.

What’s your take on this? Has something changed since my friend’s case? Could the lawyers you have been speaking with been just a little biased since they represent a firm that sues defaulted borrowers? I wonder what a lawyer who defends defaulted borrowers would say. I bet his or her personal experience might reflect a more optimistic outcome.

Why would so many lawyers come together to collectively advocate reducing the waiting period to 5 years -- calling the 10-year rule “draconian” -- if nobody will be freed of their loan regardless of the time they have to wait. Surely all these lawyers have better things to do than advocate moot causes. Surely these lawyers would also be speaking out against the draconian practice of judges conspiring to turn everyone down if this were a fact.

Come on people. Let’s hear from anyone who has attempted to include a student loan in a bankruptcy after the statutory waiting period, whether it be an old statute or a revised one. Let’s hear the good and the bad outcomes. This is clearly a hot topic that needs some personal anecdotes.

With all due respect Johnny, I think it’s pretty dangerous to be telling people they basically have almost no chance of being freed through bankruptcy, when your information is coming from a conversation you had with a lawyer who represents the government. These stats we speak of are elusive for a reason. Wouldn’t the powers that be have a vested interest in releasing numbers that show none of us stand a chance? I suspect they hide the numbers because the opposite is true; the same reason they don’t advertise stats barred legislation.

My intention is not to offend you, Johnny. I certainly respect your experience and appreciate the many insights I have gained from reading your posts. But a lawyer is just a guy who gets paid to argue one side of a two-sided case. For every lawyer who is right, another is wrong.

I guess only time will tell.


Friends don't let friends take Arts degrees
Back to Top
blah View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 18/June/2003
Location: Korea, South
Points: 101
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote blah Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06/July/2004 at 8:28am
Don’t lose hope, Tang!

When I was involved in my student association in college, my job was to act as student advocate when dealing with unfair policies of the college administration. So many times students were advised by the very powers that oppressed them that they stood no chance in a tribunal. The admin people would literally tell students “no one has ever succeeded in overturning policy in this situation”. I had to talk many students out of dropping cases that they were told were a waist of time because they wouldn’t win. The fact is that the vast majority of the time the students did win their cases.

OK. So my student association experience is hardly the same thing as going against the Canadian government. And I’m certainly not even close to being a lawyer. But I like to think my story reflects a microcosm of how things work in the “real world”. It was all legislated under the same Societies Act that governs the BC legislature, and the decisions made were just as regulated and legally binding as those made in any court-sanctioned tribunal.

Johnny’s comments in this thread are purely speculative. They represent what he believes to be true, based on what a lawyer who represent the government has stated. But until we see some actual outcomes, none of us knows what the truth of this matter really is. Johnny is clearly knowledgeable about finance and collections, and he has built himself a reputation of credibility in these areas. But he is not a doctor. So his opinion of how to deal with a skinned knee should be taken with the same wait as that of your mom – even if he spoke with a great doctor friend. Likewise, Johnny is not a lawyer. So consider his legal advice as that of a pretty smart guy who knows a lot of stuff about law.   

Again, with sincere respect to Johnny, he should be qualifying his statements in such a way as not to be counterproductive to the aims of this site. One man’s reality is another man’s pessimism. This thread certainly doesn’t represent reality until we see some actual CSL bankruptcy outcomes. I don’t see how his comments have been at all supportive.

Friends don't let friends take Arts degrees
Back to Top
peewee View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 11/February/2004
Points: 60
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote peewee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06/July/2004 at 8:38am
Amen to that Blah!!
Back to Top
Tangotori View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 17/June/2004
Location: Canada
Points: 25
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tangotori Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06/July/2004 at 9:35am

Thanks, Blah... I re-read my posting above and I do sound very doom-and-gloom, don't I?! Don't worry about me, folks! Sure I'm struggling a bit with the idea that I may never be able to get this anvil off of my back, but I'm a fighter; as soon as I can I'll be filing for bankruptcy and preparing myself for any challenge! I may have lost a little hope, but I'm definitely determined to find an answer.

I agree with you that it would be great to hear personal stories of people that have attempted to include their P and CSLs in bancruptcy. What kinds of challenges did they have to contend with/overcome? And what were the results? I suspect that most of us participating in this forum haven't had this experience (some, like Peewee, have claimed bankruptcy but didn't include their student loans) and so won't be able to share personal anecdotes. Others, like you Blah, have had friends/collegues that have been successful. So come on, everyone... lets dig around a little, do a little research, and then get what information we find back to the group!

Blah... as an aside - a couple of years ago I left beautiful BC to work in South Korea (some city near Pusan). I lasted 7 months! It was a great experience and I'd love to return (vacation), but I missed home very much. Got hooked on kimchi, though! Best of luck to you there!

Tangotori

Back to Top
SolveStudentDebt View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 05/November/2003
Location: Canada
Points: 5996
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SolveStudentDebt Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06/July/2004 at 10:41am

 

 Blah,

No offense taken. I am not a doctor nor am I a lawyer. Never said I was. I would appreciate it if you would keep the comments "above the belt" in the future though.

 Now, the issue about discharge....

 I am not trying to do anything but inform people of the ways that the system works. When the courts are in session for a section 178 hearing, they look at several factors as I had stated.

 The big question is "will the student loans be discharged?"

 ... I will simplify this to make those who feel bad a little bit better.

 The courts will hear anyone who motions a section 178. The CSLP/HRDC is the one who would either opose or not.

 Here is a case example:

 A fifty year old man with a heart condition owed CSL from a long time ago. He went bankrupt as a result of severe consumer debt and other financial woes. His case was heard and the HRDC did not opose so therefore the case was discharged. His education was a BSC.

 The courts review these motions on an individual basis, of course. They look at the reasons behind the bankruptcy as a rule. If they feel that the bankrupt has not acted in good faith - or is "frustrating" the system, then the chances are that the discharge would be oposed. If the individual has acted in good faith and is suffering from hardship that is harsh or debilitating in any way, then the odds are in the bankrupt's favor.

 So, again, ... will a student loan be discharged? The only way to know is schedule a section 178 and go for it. Each case is reviewed individually.

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Solve Student Debt specializes in solutions for students and graduates in student loan default, and those at risk of defaulting.

solvestudentdebt.com
Back to Top
peewee View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 11/February/2004
Points: 60
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote peewee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06/July/2004 at 11:04am

Tang,

When i said that i didn't include my student loans in my bankruptcy, that was a niiave idea of mine that they would remain in interest free status (i was a student at the time) if i didn't list them in my bankruptcy debt.  however, a week after i filed, RBC included them for me and they automatically went into default.  and under the current rules, my SL's have survived my bankruptcy and i am no longer eligible for any type of interest releif or debt reduction program regardless of how low my income may be.  in my hypothetical example above i mentioned an income of $50K.  this was just a number i threw out there.  i am unemployed rite now.

had i done my homework, i would've known that this would happen. it's in the canada student loans regulations clear as day.  as well, i also got bad advise from my trustee who said if i didn't list them then RBC wouldn't find out.  trust me, as soon as i found out that RBC had defaulted my loans, i tried to reverse my bankruptcy but it was too late.

so....to be clear....even though it was not my intention to default/go bankrupt on my SL's, that is what happened anyways.  i will have to wait 10 years from the date of my discharge  i.e. sept 2014 to apply to have them dissolved under the 10 year rule and that is if i am careful not to enrol in classes of any kind that could be regarded as "education"  because apparently i will reset the 10 year rule clock if i do.  .  I will be 50 years old at that time. 

my bankruptcy is not discharged yet as i am awaiting the outcome of the charter challenge, just in case.......

Back to Top
2Laural View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 29/August/2003
Location: Canada
Points: 42
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 2Laural Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06/July/2004 at 4:38pm
I feel it's time for me to speak up.

As some of you know, I work for a trustee in bankruptcy, and have extensive knowledge about bankruptcy and proposals.

As the BIA is written now, when a person files an assignment in bankruptcy, has ceased to be a student for more than 10 years, and has obtained their discharge from bankruptcy, their financial responsibility for the debt is finished.

What I think Johnny may be alluding to is that a creditor has the right to oppose a bankrupt's discharge. This is brought before a Judge in a Chambers application. At the discharge hearing, the bankrupt can (and should) be present, the lawyer and/or opposing creditor, the judge (of course) and occasionally the trustee (not mandatory that the trustee attends). The opposing creditor the presents their argument, the judge asks the bankrupt their side of things, and makes his decision as to the type of discharge - Absolute (effective that day), Suspended (effective after the suspension period), Refused (not allowed at all), or Conditional (upon the bankrupt doing something - which may be paying money).

The Student Loans Program is notorious for having legal counsel oppose a great number of bankrupt's discharge - no matter whether or not the person has an income or ability to pay or not.

S. 178 of the BIA outlines the types of debts that survive a bankruptcy, and not the types of discharges that the Court issues.

If anyone has any further questions, please contact me.
Back to Top
SolveStudentDebt View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 05/November/2003
Location: Canada
Points: 5996
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SolveStudentDebt Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06/July/2004 at 5:08pm

 

 I am happy that you have come and added to this, Laurel. Thank you very much. You know the system well enough to see where I am coming from.

 Good to see you again.

 Johnny

Solve Student Debt specializes in solutions for students and graduates in student loan default, and those at risk of defaulting.

solvestudentdebt.com
Back to Top
markomeara View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Site Founder

Joined: 30/May/2002
Location: Canada
Points: 186
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote markomeara Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06/July/2004 at 5:11pm
Laura,
I think you have explained this well. I would like to add that the task force on insolvency recommended that the 10 year limit be changed to 5 years... AND ,and this is a big big and that will play out in the courts..
...the task force also stated that the previous legislation only allowed for the total discharge of the student loan debt, not a portion of it...   they are recommending that the legislation be changed to allow partial discharge.....

So, if the recommendations of the task force are implemented in full we shall see the following:
a) reduction of 10 year rule to 5 years.
b) legislation change to review circumstances and discharge only a portion of the student debt.

So one would have to prove that one can not pay the debt without hardship, and that one did not recieve any benefit from the education....

So I think both you and Johnny have very valid points. If the task force recommendations go through, it will be a whole new situation.

Thanks for your well written summary!

Mark

Edited by administrator
Back to Top
peewee View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 11/February/2004
Points: 60
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote peewee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06/July/2004 at 5:21pm
so, even if only the accumulated interest would be discharged, that would be a big help.  my point was, what if you were unable to pay for several years and then your situation got better and then were able to pay.  you would have a lot of making up to do in terms of interest charges.  i think that most of us would have have no problem paying what we borrowed when we are finally in a situation to do so.  but for those of us who don't qualify for interest relief, we get penalized for our misfortune. 
Back to Top
SolveStudentDebt View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 05/November/2003
Location: Canada
Points: 5996
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SolveStudentDebt Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06/July/2004 at 5:48pm

 

 Blah and Peewee,

 The HRDC is very protective of their investments. Interest accrual is one of them. Blah, you say that these issues are of my opinion. Don't assume things like this. I am more than just educated in this field. I was part of it at one time.

 You will find no statistics on how many have been discharged and how many haven't. If you have friends who have had student loans discharged back in the days when the limitation period was only 2 years, the system was more flexible back then. The doors and windows started to close up in the year 1997. Things are not the same now as they were then.

 2Laurel knows bankruptcy. You should direct your questions about this to her. This is her profession. If you want to know how the HRDC and Provinces respond to - and addresses these matters, then by all means, ask away.

 From the oposition's perspective, the HRDC will opose if they determine if a bankrupt has not acted in good faith, or is frustrating the system. You could be donnie Trump or down and out in Beverley Hills, it is not an issue.

 Johnny  

 

Solve Student Debt specializes in solutions for students and graduates in student loan default, and those at risk of defaulting.

solvestudentdebt.com
Back to Top
blah View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 18/June/2003
Location: Korea, South
Points: 101
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote blah Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07/July/2004 at 7:07am
Johnny:

I apologize if the analogies I chose came across as flippant or crass. But I don’t believe any of my statements were below the belt.

If I understated your credentials, I apologize for that as well. But having been a part of the system does not elevate your opinion to being more than that of an educated one – and a valuable one.

My point is that people in our predicament are often vulnerable to aggrandizing expert opinion to that of absolute truth. You are as free to express your beliefs on this matter as anyone else. But your knowledge and reputation come with a greater responsibility to be keenly aware of how impacting your words can be on those clawing for answers. Your second post tells us “…the chances of an absolute discharge are slim to none”. Now if I said that, it would be taken with a grain of salt. When you say it, people lose hope and slip into a state of depression. So I don’t think it was appropriate for someone with your authority to present such an opinion as if it were fact.

In a subsequent post, you gave an example of a successful CSL bankruptcy outcome. I found that post to be both unbiased and enlightening. It reminds us of the real possibility of being denied release from debt. But it also provides us with some insight on what circumstances have been considered by at least one judge when allowing for a complete discharge.

I value your contribution to this site, and continue to look forward to reading your insightful posts.
Friends don't let friends take Arts degrees
Back to Top
peewee View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 11/February/2004
Points: 60
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote peewee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08/July/2004 at 5:38pm

here's an article that gives a pretty good history about the CSLP.  its a bit dated, jan 2001 but an interesting and informative read nonetheless. the link is:  www.insolvency.ca/papers/PICReport.html

and it is entitled :

Report of the Personal Insolvency Committee of the Insolvency Institute of Canada

Recommendations for Reform and Further Amendments to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act

 

Back to Top
fedup View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 09/July/2004
Points: 10
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote fedup Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09/July/2004 at 10:24am

It was my understanding that if you did not recieve an absolute discharge (after bankruptcy) that you would only be required to pay a lesser amount for say a few years. Does anyone know about this?

I am also wondering about consumer proposals (after the now 10 year period)??

Myself: i am in major debt but am fortunate to have a fairly decent paying job (teacher 53, 000/year with wife and one child), however i am fedup of paying over 700 month in student loans. i have been out of university for 5 years and have made little (if any) dent in my loans which total close to $60, 000!

With my wife's student loans (after she's finished her doctorate) we will owe well over 100, 000! Yikes.

We have been married over 10 years and have not once been able to take a vacation or buy things that this education was supposed to bring. If not for her parents we would still be living in poverty as after loans are paid, rent... there is not a cent left at the end of the month. I will be near retirement by the time i pay off these damn loans--maybe then i'll get my vacation (or sweet death)

What ticks me off is that i have a friend who had no student debt (parents paid) but tallied up 10's of thousands of dollars in credit card debt. This guy took vacations, dressed to the nines... He ended up decaring bankrupcy and was discharged having to pay a very reduced amount for 2 years (i think). What ticks me off about this is that these kinds of bankruptcies are discharged and student loans (with morgage sized debts) are not even considered. Education is not a privilege it's a right.

For the record i am considering making a proposal after the 10 year period (or if the period changes). As a child grew up in poverty.There have been many times that i wished i had just stayed in my old neighbourhood and went on welfare. School is the ticket out but it comes at a very high, very stressful price. Students should not be racked with this kind of debt. It is not right.

My RANT--very cathartic

fedup
Back to Top
hunter View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 04/September/2003
Location: Canada
Points: 640
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hunter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09/July/2004 at 10:57am
So then let's say if after your loans are ten years old, and you can not get the students discharged in the original bankruptcy, then why would you not file bankruptcy again if it means they will be discharged then. Or are there laws that will prevent this.
I am seriously thinking about doing this, as there is not way that mine will ever be paid off.

And since my credit is screwed already, how much worse can it get.
I too am waiting for the decision of the Charter as I have heard that if you file for BK twice, it will only be reported on your credit file for about 2 years.
SO we will see what happens.!!
Back to Top
fedup View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 09/July/2004
Points: 10
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote fedup Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11/July/2004 at 6:34am

It was my understanding that while student loans are not usually discharged they can be CONDITIONALLY DISCHARGED (after the ten year period of course). This means that you would pay a set amount per month for 2 or 3 years. After this you are completely discharged.

Does anyone have information on this?

fedup
Back to Top
hunter View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 04/September/2003
Location: Canada
Points: 640
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hunter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12/July/2004 at 7:02am
This ones for 2laural:

You stated: "As the BIA is written now, when a person files an assignment in bankruptcy, has ceased to be a student for more than 10 years, and has obtained their discharge from bankruptcy, their financial responsibility for the debt is finished".

So lets say I filed in 2002, but it will be 2008 before my student loans are ten years, so will they be discharged in the bankruptcy, or will I have to go to court and ask for the student loans to be discharged???
My trustee told me that I will have to file bankruptcy again in 2008 to have them discharged. She says she knows nothing about the loans being discharged after the ten years, Then again she is not returning my phone calls.

Can you please elaborate on this?
Thanks so much
Back to Top
danny View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 12/January/2004
Location: United Kingdom
Points: 176
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote danny Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21/July/2004 at 11:25am
all this trouble and all we wanted was decent jobs

when i started school i saved 20k but ended up owing 32k since i couldnt work with a criminal record

i figured if i got a job for 12 bucks i would break even(32k =-2.5 bucks an hour and i need so and so much to live)

problem is i didnt get nothing and the result is that my degree is hindering my job search... i cant enter my field without experience but i couldnt get practiccuums with a criminal record and im over qualified to pump gas..it seems to me that the system is political because i get the run around everywhere ---in other words you got to know someone

maybe i have to know someone to get my loan discharged too
Johnny save me!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.07
Copyright ©2001-2024 Web Wiz Ltd.